Monday, October 31, 2005

Scary Blog Stories (Corporate Version)

Happy Halloween, everyone!

I wanted to share a
scary blog story for you, which came out last week
in Forbes
magazine.


It's not a scary story in the
traditional sense (though I might post it to Scalzi's
Halloween assignment
anyway).

It goes a
little something like this:

Once upon a
time
,

there was a corporation. It was a nice little publicly-traded

corporation, one that was well-positioned in the market, with a sound

business model, good brand recognition and a robust line of products

and/or services.

All the people liked the little
publicly-traded

corporation, which also generated good shareholder value and had
strong

prospects for sustained growth over the middle-to-long
term.

One day, and for no apparent
reason
(or because of something that happened to the nice
little publicly-traded corporation that was not its
fault
, according to the nice little publicly-traded
corporation's nice public relations people), a mob
of angry bloggers, dressed in ragged pajamas and other scary outfits,
rose up with a great hue and
cry
,

and as if as one, yelled out:





"Little publicly-traded corporation! We

don't like you!!! In fact, we hate you and we will
make it our mission to

spread mean, slanderous, hateful, untrue things about you and your

robust line of products and/or services! We will stalk and
harass


anyone who comes to defend you!





(The scary bloggers liked using lots of exclamation points.)





"Plus, we will be so loud and there will be
so many of

us, that our words will spread wide throughout the land and the

mainstream media, and no one will listen to your nice public relations
people!





"And if that's not enough, our mean words will show up ahead of yours
in major search engines! (Which were accomplices to
the mean, angry bloggers, although in a nonliable way.) 






"Finally, our nasty lies will keep showing up, even
after we lose interest and move on to our next victim and there's
nothing you can do about it!"

And
it was true: There was nothing the nice little publicly-traded
corporation could do about it.

The
End.


This is my take on the Forbes
article, which was entitled 'Attack
of the Blogs'
(free registration or BugMeNot.com
required).

It's a scaremongering article about how
an online lynch mob (actual
phrase) of bloggers will smear you and take down your company. (The
phrase reminds me of Al Gore's "digital
brownshirts"
remark, only the Forbes article strikes me as a
tad more hysterical.)

Now,

first off, keep in mind, I work for a company that has a long
tradition

and abundance of Web sites (way, way before blogs) dedicated to

chronicling how much we suck. Some criticisms were fair, some less so,

and our reactions have ranged from things we've done well and things

we've done poorly, so we're still learning and making mistakes,
too.

Also, since "the blogosphere" is so big and
wide-ranging (20
million strong
,

by one count), it's always risky to generalize anything about bloggers
-- it's a lazy shortcut to fall back on (which I,

admittedly, have used).



Back to the article: BoingBoing
was there commenting early in the fray; they also link to the
always-insightful Dan
Gillmor.


Suffice to say, reactions I've
seen have been generally negative, though I haven't
seen any mobs with pitchforks and torches yet (not even digital
ones.)

At some level, the article is so
over the top, I'm wondering if some bloggers just
think Forbes is trolling (or at least, generating
controversy to sell magazines -- after all, didn't they just do a Best Blogs of the Web
this summer?)

In any case, it's so
overheated that it's ripe for skewering; here's a
parody
rant on the printing press
from the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
and here's satire from the
QandO blog.


Anyway, a more
level-headed view
of how companies should manage their
relationship with the blogosphere depends on really taking that word
seriously: Relationship.





To fall back on a big marketing phrase that's going around and around
and around: "Markets
are conversations."
(That link is from another Forbes article
-- go figure -- by James Surowiecki, the author of  'The
Wisdom of Crowds'
)

For companies, this
means understanding that consumers (even those who are bloggers) are
not the enemy, and are in fact worth listening
to.

Companies

like when people say nice things about their company; the tricky part

is not minding when people say not-nice things about their company --
it shows that those people care -- then knowing
what to do to make things right.

It's a concept that
comes up when corporate-types discuss how to take advantage of brand
blogs
, or the unofficial and unaffiliated blogs that fans or
critics of a company write.

However,

to really "get it", companies can't look at blogs and the blogosphere

as something that can exploited. Like many things, the more
you

put into something, the more you get out of it.

This
can be a

little off-putting for companies, because it involves transparency and

authenticity. (I'm reminded of the joke/quote, attributed to different

people: "Sincerity? If you can fake it, you've got it
made.")

It

also means giving up a measure of control, though control in this

context is kind of a myth -- people are talking, and they're talking

whether you're involved or not.

So what do you use
instead of control and spin?

Why,
truth, of
course.

This goes for PR types, too. Here's an
article on media training by PR-type
and blogger David Parmet
(whom I also know from a past
life).

Anyway,

there are a lot of examples being passed around of good ways and bad

ways that companies have reacted to the attention of the blogosphere.

Here are a few of them -- you can judge for yourself what falls into

which category.

* The Kryptonite
lock controversy
from 2004

* The iPod's dirty
little secret
video (about at-the-time nonreplaceable
batteries) from 2003

Also, a fairly current version
involves defective
Sony chips in a lot of digital cameras
-- a digital camera enthusiast's
board
put 2 and 2 together -- we'll see how this one shakes
out.



Take a look and see what you think. Also, don't forget to brush your
teeth! Thanks. -- Joe

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Joe,!!!~~~~~~~~~~~(unleashing Joe's flag)!!!
Hey thanks !and (((((Happy Halloween)))) or ALL Hallowed Eve!
hugs,natalie

Anonymous said...

Yup, that sure is a scary corporate story.
Just want to let you know that Teresa started an AOL Halloween trick or treat craze. Check it out at: http://journals.aol.com/teeisme57/OhMyWord/entries/1568.  
Happy Halloween, Joe!

Anonymous said...

     "... this means understanding that consumers (even those who are
      bloggers)  are not the enemy, and are in fact worth listening to."

In fact, it means understanding that consumers are not only not the enemy, they are the ones who pay the salaries and the stock dividends, no matter whose signature is on the check.  That's a trueism that seems to have been lost in today''s business world, digital or other wise.  

Anonymous said...

how true. there is a clique of people in the blogs and message boards that are downright cruel to people who don't agree with everything they say. i've had my experience with them and do not care to ever visit with them again. it's a total losing battle to try to make them understand anything. they read between the lines and decide on their own view on things and they stick together thru everything. i've had things said about me by people i don't even know. they only know me by my screenname. one girl met a guy from match.com and spent time talking about how terrible i am and the terrible things that i do. all untrue. we have never met and i have no idea who she is except by a screenname that the guy told me about. he believed her and wrote some horrible things to me. i had never even heard of him before. isn't that amazing? some people take this way too seriously. i thought it was funny that she thought so much of me to take time on her date to talk about me. just my opinion on things.

Anonymous said...

I get worse than that just being Guest Editor here.

Anonymous said...

It's not just Sony with the chips. Canon has some issues as well. Now when I read a "my camera is busted" entry there is much more venom being directed at the camera maker than I used to see. Camera folks are usually very loyal even when in distress over gear.

Glad you picked up the printing press parody! Classic net at it's best.

Anonymous said...

Boo!

Anonymous said...

Boring is the word.  I have had some real life supernatural.  and stories to tell from from old home in Morristown, where the Revelutionary war was.  I dont know. i write in my blog because if for my Sanity which I am daily fighing with.  These stories of "oh, i chrocheted an Afghan for my poodle" "lets see other pet." I like to hear real stories about people lives who endure addiction, depression, which is a very important Topic with all the Suicide and drug Use.  I am a recoverying but still of a Methadone type program.  Every once in a while we should get to a real issues of real life.  I dont care who see's my emotional turmoil and my fight with drug Addiction.  If it could help on person.  I will have been well worth my time.  BECAUSE DUALY DIAGNOSED ADDICTION/MENTAL  illness reaks havoks on alot of people lives.  I cling on to life for my son, whome also was effected by my disease.  And i have not seen him in 5 months nor does he care to. My life is more than i can bear.  i just dont want to go back out there, i rather die.  So all you people with your "good house keeping" Life.  Should do a story, about anything that is so painful, or just want  to scream at the world.  cause i  had/ .  PEACE....[WHICH I JUST WANT]    Thanks, Tia

Anonymous said...

This is the first AOL blog interaction I've had other than the creation of my own journal. (which, btw I'm hoping for comments for, lol)

Isn't it funny how the latest, useful and popular innovation is always put the to this same test?   I suppose any thing new is considered a threat by some until proven otherwise and by that time we'll be on to the "next best thing"

The comment I appreciated the most, though you made many valuable comments here, was "Why, truth, of course".  It doesn't get any simpler than this!

Give me a view when you can!http://journals.aol.com/loralei37/ThemeaningoflifeandothersuchBS/





Anonymous said...

Corporations just don't understand the basic concept of Blogs so they view them as frightful, prehaps evil. I can't even begin to imagine how Blogs will affect the corporate landscape 5 years from now, but I do know that it's time for corporations to  come out of denial and learn to love those bloggers. Right now I am encouraging my company to start blogs in some key areas, but it's a tough sell. Amazingly, many of the execs have never seen a blog and can't begin to imagine how they might be useful.

Steven
www.workandlifetoday.blogspot.com