Monday, December 12, 2005

The Year in Ideas

Hi everybody. I was reading the New York Times Sunday Magazine (online,
of course), which was their annual Year
in Ideas
issue.

This

is great, because I get to link to a lot of interesting stuff without

having to do a lot of work (though I plan on talking about a few of

these things in greater depth).

Anyway, I've
highlighted some of the bloggier and community-type
stuff:

(One

note: The online version of the article would be a lot friendlier if

they linked to all of the stuff that they talked about. Also, since

it's the New York Times, free registration may be required. I guess

that was two notes.)

* Fleeting
Relationships
looks at the value of fleeting
relationships
(e.g. the people on the bus with you) and
anchored relationships (people you see only at
specific venues).

* Google
Map Mashups
examines the neat things you can do with Google Maps' plug-in
architecture. Combined with Folksonomy
(which is like community content tagging) and Open
Source Reporting
, it's very Web 2.0 (which
is something I will definitely be discussing
more).

* On the mostly-blog side,
we've got Splogs
(or spam blogs), Newspapers
Blogging
as a primary source of info during Katrina, the rise
of Video
Podcasting
, and the supposition that Conservative
Blogs
are more effective than liberal blogs at advancing
their agendas.

* From the phone
world
, we see a service geared to Preventing
Drunk Dialing
, plus, a way from the MIT Media Lab for groups
of people to vote on whether you should be allowed to take
that cell phone call.


* Then, some that
are just interesting include: the difference
between British and American smiles
, the reason why yawns
are contagious
, the kind of morbid but thought-provoking idea
that you should hug
a suicide bomber
(that is, because of the dynamics of a
suicide bomb explosion, one should sacrifice yourself to save others
around you), the cone
of babble
, and lastly, the idea that the crawl at the bottom
of the TV news makes
you stupid.


As they say, food for thought.
Thanks -- Joe

No comments: