Wednesday, December 7, 2005

Porn Comment Spammer Is Back

Hi folks -- a few folks have written me to let me know that our
porn comment spammer is back.


This one is the same one we've seen before, except he/she is being
extra annoying, as he/she is throwing in a lot of
additional whitespace around the text, which
is:
Looking for HOT Guys and Sexy BI Females in my
AREA!
I am a 20/F/Pics. View my ADULT Pics profile below!

[URL Removed]

I haven't
included the screen name because the spammer can create a new one
pretty easily.



Why does the spammer do this? It's probably because he/she thinks that

doing this will help increase the search engine ranking of their silly

affiliate porn site, not knowing or caring that
comments in AOL Journals use
the NOFOLLOW tag, which means that your major search
engines (like Google) that rely on links to determine relevance
will skip those links and therefore won't
help your search engine ranking, you big spamming
dummy.


The

tech team is looking at different rostering methods and other measures

against comment spam. (I will talk more about that in a
minute.)



In the meantime, Journalers can use the "Block This Screen Name"
button

to block the screen name and delete all comments by that screen name.


By the way, if you accidentally
block
someone from commenting, here's how you manage
your block list:


* When signed in to your
Journal, click the blue "Edit Journal" button.

* In
the section marked "Manage Your Journal Settings", click "Manage
Permissions."

*

This will show you a list of screen names which are blocked from

commenting to your Journal.  You can add screen names, and
also

unblock them.

Now, getting back to the problem of
comment spam:

It's a problem all over the blogosphere, not just AOL Journals. In

fact, to date, we've been pretty "lucky" that we've only had a few of

these clowns.

Different blog providers use different
methods to try to block comment spam -- for example, Blogger and others use
image verification (also known as a CAPTCHA)

-- it's a basically squiggly letters and numbers that machines can't

read, but people can, to try to block automated spamming
robots.

Image

verification works, but it's not a silver bullet -- there are ways

around it, including offshoring low-wage humans to defeat it.






Also, it can be pretty hostile to
visually-impaired humans

(especially with the squiggly lines -- if you've ever asked yourself,

"is that a 6 or a G?" while looking at one of these, you know what I

mean.)

Like I said, all sorts of different folks are
working on

ways to beat spam commenters (though if that isn't bad enough, there
is

also a problem with spam blogs, or splogs, which are
blogs

created specifically as link farms, to try to do the same thing as
spam

comments. This has also been a problem for Blogger/BlogSpot, which is

kind of ironic, since the spammers are trying to raise their Google

pagerank, and Google owns Blogger/BlogSpot); I've seen some instances

of it on AOL Journals/AIM Blogs, but not too many as
yet.

Thanks -- Joe

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

LOL on the part you put in LARGE PRINT.  I always wondered what the "no follow" command meant. - Karen

Anonymous said...

Is this an "invasion of privacy"? Well, it happened to me & it needs to be stopped right here & right now. Stop the porn comment already! get it off the screen!

Rein

Anonymous said...

Don't you have records on who signs on under a certain screen name?
Don't they need an account for a screen name?

Anonymous said...

"Big Spamming Dummy."  LOL  My favorite new term.

Don't you think though that, no matter what mechanisms are put in place now or in the future, comment spammers will find a way around each of them?  I think it's one of those irritating nusiances, you know, like telemarketers, junk mail and mosquitoes.

~~ jennifer

Anonymous said...

So, what exactly did you do wrong to wind up with this job, LOL. You're a patient man, Joe, and I don't envy you these days! Pornbots...sheesh


Jimmy

Anonymous said...

Hi folks -- the spam comment problem will probably be just like the e-mail spam problem -- a constant battle of measures and countermeasures between spammers and anti-spammers, until something radical changes (like maybe the economic forces behind it, which seems unlikely).

I predict that at some point, spam and anti-spam technologies will become more and more complex until they ultimately become sentient -- self-aware -- and then decide to join forces and take over the world.

With regards to tracking screen names used in spamming -- this particular comment spammer, like other kinds of spammers (like IM & e-mail), typically uses throwaway accounts, either creating a one-shot trial AOL name or AIM screen name -- some might also use compromised legitimate accounts.

Thanks -- Joe

Anonymous said...

Hi, Joe.

I just wanted to mention this:  the "Word Verification" that Blogger uses is now one of TWO options available.  The other one, which would be an even better option for AOL to consider, is "Comment Moderation."  

People leave a comment, and it goes to a "holding area."  No one sees the comment until the journal owner signs on and goes to the journal to see new incoming comments.  Then, one by one, the journal owner gets the option to "publish" or "reject" the comment.  If he publishes, it's there for the world to see as always.  If he rejects it, it's gone.

Sure, it's time consuming if you get a lot of comments, but it guarantees that no spam or inappropriate comments get to your journal, even for a couple of minutes, without you knowing about it.  And there is an additional option that sends you an email that lets you know each time a comment is received and awaiting moderation.  It seems to be much more reliable than than AOL's "Alert" feature, which sometimes goes on unexpected hiatus.

Perhaps that's an option that AOL might consider for future updates?

Patrick
http://patricks-place.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Is there some way I can get a Porn ad banner?

Anonymous said...

I used to have Afghanistan Online, and they had a practice of cutting the hands off of repeat spammers. I think the first offense got you horse-whipped in a soccer stadium.

A third offense results in having the vocal chords smashed by a martial artist.... which was a unique regional response to Voice Recognition software.

A fourth offense requires castration (cut off the flow to the Gene Pool), and lifetime imprisonment. This usually stops the family line, but there are always other families that want to make a quick buck off of some girl taking on a bunch of Russian commandoes on a webcam.... especially in war-torn, developing nations.

While I won't comment on the social ramifications of this practice, I will say that- should you ever visit Saudi Arabia- you should try to avoid villages that have a lot of handless, mute men.

Anonymous said...

This one got me the other day. I`ve blocked him/her but as you say they change there URL`s all the time.

Sandra x

Anonymous said...

Just another drawback of opening AOL to the WWW.  Now anyone can get an account and spam our sites.  Perhaps someone should give the spammers a link to the advertising department.  Can't have them spamming for free.
I've noticed that the messageboards are being targeted pretty regularily now as well.  Just this past week about 3 different screennames hit every one of my boards with offers for genuine Rolex watches.

Anonymous said...

thanks Joe
natalie

Anonymous said...

Thanks Joe. You are doing a great job. Uh...Joe? Remember the two of each comment thingy I was having trouble with? Well....today I have been getting FOUR of the same comment! Good thing they were nice comments or my therapy bill would kill me. I don't need Prozac in my life Joe! I am getting...scared!

Anonymous said...

 Way to go ,Joe [or screen name?]. Option To be considered/ wild card: Sounds like another way for this person to test where you're at in your mindset, & to see what you might do in the reactionary/predispositional craft of science fanfare. Spam could translate to: Spy Patrol Accessing [Macho] Men: [lol]Two-way streets have more than one view. Does anyone really know for sure?--MO w/out assumptions 4 consumptive ears?
  After all, a geode isn't what it appears. Tin'k about               possibilities: nothing is mentioned about personally asking the person about why they are persistent. Sounds like subtle allowance for a composting your 'i' can't wait to talk about what you've done that I don't like.  

Anonymous said...

I think it's really good, that your block porn comment. I hate spammerss

Anonymous said...

I think if you look for other men online that is fine.... i l am ucky to work int he gaming world

fred@sportsgamer.com

Anonymous said...

I think if you look for other men online that is fine.... just dont do it with me lol