I came across this hard-hitting piece of Pulitzer material this morning courtesy of Fark:
"Sexy Is the New Scary."
It reveals the shocking news that
On the one hand, I guess this story had to be written. Papers (and certain blogs) need filler material, after all. And I mean, this is kind of a funny angle."Looking sexy is now considered normal, feminine behavior for a woman, so on a day like Halloween, women will take it as creative license to wear revealing clothing and no one can call them a tramp that day," said Donna Gough, an assistant professor of women's studies at Cal State Fullerton. "And for men, it's a day where they can openly stare at and drool over women in such attire without being called a chauvinist pig."
But on the other hand, duh. Is this a legitimate problem? The article continues to quote Gough, saying
"The message being sent for a woman is that you have to wear these costumes to fit in and be normal and be considered attractive and appealing to men."
I'm a dude, so I'll be the first to admit that I might not exactly know what I'm talking about here. I can't exactly speak for women here since I've never been one -- but what if women WANT to tart it up on Halloween? Maybe the sexy costume thing isn't so much a social pressure as an unfurling of repressed id.
I've got three female friends who want to sass it up bigtime on Halloween, and not one of them has said to me, "Gosh, Jeff, I really wanted to dress up like a cardboard box for Halloween, but thanks to all this social pressure I'm practically forced to be G-string Catwoman."
One Farker makes a decent case for the contrary in the comment thread, however:
It's just kind of depressing to me, all the competing ... instead of having fun and being creative. I dunno, there's enough pressure on women to act like sex objects the other 364 days of the year. I got sick of it after a while, and I really didn't like the way I was treated when I did dress like that. So I stopped. And I still have no problem getting laid.There doesn't seem to be any equivalent for men, though. I've never seen that many dudes dressed as the Sexy Plumber, Sexy Pizza Man, or Sexy Doctor Octopus. But then again, I may be at the wrong parties to see that sort of thing. According to my friend Kenny Hill, Managing Editor of Worth Repeating, plenty of guys dress that way ... they're just not exactly my target audience.
There's no trend toward sexy costumes in the gay world, dude, unless you call at least three decades a trend. Halloween is the gay national holiday, the epitome of which was Castro Street on Halloween before the straight gawkers and tourists ruined it. Sorry.In my opinion, the whole point of Halloween is to be something you're not -- to be either scary or funny as all hell. Among my friends, I'm kinda infamous for burying a suit in the dirt two weeks before Halloween, digging it up before a party and dumping fake gore over my head to be the nastiest zombie I could think of.
Whether we're dressing up or dressing down, gays push boundaries with costumes for Halloween. But it's nothing new. Butt-less chaps, guys playing nurse-sluts, women in cop uniforms with bulging packages ... We wrote the book. It's called having fun. Personally though, I think clever and timely costumes usually trump slutty.
What are your most infamous or legendary costumes? Ladies (and gents), do you like to sass it up for Halloween or play it low-key? You know what the comments are and where they stay -- let it be known.
11 comments:
h
I once went as a victim of a bike accident. I sawed some ten-speed handle bars in half and duct taped (yes, ouch!) them to my chest and back, had them run through my shirt, and covered them in fake blood. I also took the crank and sprocket, sawed that a bit, and stuck that on my head through a hat with blood and some fake brains hanging off the pedal.
I knew it was a choice costume when my sister-in-law (She of the Weak Stomach) took a look at me and almost threw up.
Unfortunately, I didn't win the costume contest. I lost to a guy who went as John Hancock. Let's just say his costume included an early-American statesman's wardrobe (complete with the powdered wig) and the rather creative use of a prosthetic hand.
-Dan
http://journals.aol.com/dpoem/TheWisdomofaDistractedMind/
h
NOTHING TO DO WITH HALLOWEEN. BUT HOPEFULLY, SOMEBODY AT AOL JOURNAL WOULD BE KIND ENOUGH TO ADDRESS THIS CONCERN. SOME OF US DON'T SEEM TO GET MANY RESULTS FROM WRITING HERE WITH PROBLEMS..WE WONDER WHY???
MY PROBLEM IS THIS: THE ARCHIEVE'S WHEN BROUGHT UP, HAVE A LENGTHY SPACE, WIDE OPEN WHITE SPACE- BETWEEN THE INITIAL INFORMATION, AND THE ADDED OR POSTED ITEMS. SOMETHING NEW I THINK.
COULD THAT BE ADDRESSED BY JOURNAL EXPERTS.
THANX,
LARRY OCTOBER 24, 2006
http://journals.aol.com/larryt39/LarrysThoughts
Your archives look prefectly normal when I look at them, Larry.
-Paul
http://journals.aol.ca/plittle/AuroraWalkingVacation/
They look fine to me too, Larry.
However, International Caps Lock Day has come and gone (I think it was last Saturday, but I'm not sure).
-Dan
http://journals.aol.com/dpoem/TheWisdomofaDistractedMind/
Joe~Great entry and funny about it being ok to be scandlous and chauvisists. I am inot the kids costimes and the candy! Have fun! Sassy ;-)
http://journals.aol.com/sassydee50/sassysEYE
Larry -- I'm sorry you feel overlooked ... however, I searched through my inbox and have not seen any mail from you. It's certainly not my intention to overlook you at all. I'll email with specific questions/answers.
-Jeff
Paul, Dan thanx much for stopping by...I am still having the same problem, throughout my site.. Jeff is on it I blieve..very prompt is he.
Larry October 25, 2006
http://journals.aol.com/LarryT39/LarrysThoughts
Of course I tart it up on Halloween if we are going out!! Hey why not! Hubby likes it and so does every one else!!
h
Post a Comment