Thursday, January 11, 2007

The AOL Pictures Team on the New Features

Hi folks -- as I mentioned on Monday, the folks from the AOL Pictures team rolled out a few enhancements this week. They include:
  • "New comment" indicators on photos (and on the main page)
  • Improved upload experience -- caption your photos as they upload
  • Picture properties, including details about the camera and resolution
  • More international language support
  • And more to come.
Go check out their blog entry about it, and get Alerted when the AOL Pictures blog updates.

Thanks -- Joe

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

7:45pm: Blogged About Lifelogging

NPR's On the Media has a transcript from an interview last week [link via Obscurestore] with Gordon Bell. He's a senior researcher for Microsoft who's trying to blog about... everything.

The generic term for this is "lifelogging" (Microsoft's name for the project is "MyLifeBits", presumably for the dual meaning of "bits" -- pieces of stuff, as well as the technical term for the smallest pieces of computer data, ones and zeroes).

It's a pretty intense concept: It means recording everything you possibly can about your life -- phone calls, e-mails, napkin notes, visited Web sites... even, in this case, wearing a camera around your neck that automatically snaps a pic every minute.

Think of it as blogging, only nuclear-powered.

In the pre-computer days, when we collected stuff from our everyday lives, most of it was just pocket junk: ticket stubs, train schedules, receipts; anything with a short useful lifespan.

Sometimes, they became materials for collages or souvenirs for scrapbooks.

Wait long enough, though, and historians start calling it ephemera.

Anyway, do too much of it, and people call you a packrat; if you're a packrat long enough, maybe eventually you'll be a compulsive "hoarder", with a house filled with junk.

With data, though, it's different, since data storage is relatively cheap, as opposed to buying a new house when your current one fills up with stuff.

How useful would lifelogging be, assuming you're not some sociologist from the future? It's hard to say, but it's a thought experiment that raises some interesting questions.

For example, even assuming this recording happens in the background (because if you had to consciously stop and record everything, you'd never be able to do anything), how would you find what you need from that mass of data?

It's hard to say "this is important data," when "importance" is relative. If you have a grease fire, knowing where you put the saucepan lid is vitally important knowledge. So maybe looking at lifelogging helps us improve the way we search and find information. (That's just an example.)

Anyway, reading about lifelogging reminded me of the things:

* When the Pentagon talks about trying  something like this, it's seen as sinister

* Who else does stuff like this? Why, the Unabomber:
"He wrote about everything. He wrote about what he had for lunch on May 5, 1979, where he got the food, how he prepared it and what did it taste like," [retired FBI Special Agent Max] Noel said.
I'm out of observations, so I will wrap this up with a relevant Steven Wright joke:

"I have a map of the United States, life size. 1 mile equals 1 mile. It's a bitch to fold it."

Thanks -- Joe

StephanieBamBam Talks About the Next Journals Releases

In her latest entry, Journals Product Manager Stephanie discusses the next Journals releases; go check out her entry (and subscribe to her blog's New Entry Alert); in a nutshell:
  • Release 11 (or R11) is currently scheduled for some time in February '07. It's going to be a relatively small release; this is because we're saving our powder for...
  • Blogs 2.0, which will try to get AOL blogging features up to speed with the rest of the universe (in competitive terms, this is called "parity"); it may be a rolling release in 2007; check in with Stephanie for more details and product requests, etc.
Thanks -- Joe

Send Lawyers, Guns, Hockey Players and Video Store Clerks

Hi folks -- a couple of quick hits today:

* Following up on my entry on lawyers blogging, here's a Washington Post article featuring another blogging lawyer, with a twist: Adam Tiffen, a buttoned-down, self-described "nice Jewish boy" and DC lawyer, spent a year in Iraq deployed with the Maryland National Guard in Saba al-Bor, a town outside of Baghdad.

During his deployment, he kept a milblog, The Replacements [strong language] detailing his experiences -- check it out.

* Also of local interest: Ted Leonsis, AOL notable and Washington Capitals owner, talks about how the Caps have embraced bloggers, including giving a dozen bloggers press credentials, and generally encouraging and supporting the local sports blogging community.

Ted's always been pretty active and public with his support of online community and incorporating it into his sports ventures (ranging from participating in online chats, message boards, and even, yes, answering his e-mail), so this is strictly in character for him.

(Link via The Express -- it's another Post link, since it's their free, commuter-targeted daily)

* Via Wonkette (so, naturally, strong language warning applies): political pundit Tucker Carlson has a run-in with a blogging video store clerk. Guess who loses his job over it? (Three guesses, and the first two don't count.)

Thanks -- Joe

Monday, January 8, 2007

I'm a Blogger and I'm Not Afraid to Admit It

Here are a couple of leftovers from last week (remember, the sooner you start falling behind, the quicker you can start catching up), which I belately found had a theme of sorts. Well, except for the first item, which I just thought was funny:

* A New Take on Citizen Journalism: Wanted -- citizen journalist to cover court case. Must have experience as a sex-worker. Bonus: The gig doesn't pay anything. Ahh, those wacky Canucks...

* Ceci n'est pas une blog -- News of the Weird's Chuck Shepard wants you to know that his daily update Web page is not a blog (scroll to "housekeeping"). Despite that whole "living on a blogspot.com address" thing. And the RSS feed and the archives (which say "Blog Archives"). Look, see: No comments. Can't be a blog. Nope.

Some people are still afraid of the whole "blog" nomenclature and what it represents to them. Don't ask me why.

In extreme cases, these blog refuseniks will have a Web page that they update daily (or more frequently). They may even take feedback or comments of sorts. They just don't have the other useful things, like built-in searchable archives, feeds and alerts.

So they'll basically have all the hassle (daily publishing) and none of the benefits.

I would call out the person I'm thinking of, but his "not a blog" is on hiatus for now. (GeneWeingarten
GeneWeingartenGeneWeingarten)

I'm not sure what's worse -- someone who has a blog and refuses to call it a blog, or someone who doesn't have a blog, but says they do.

(The "Ceci n'est pas une blog" is a high-falutin' reference to this here René Magritte painting.)

* In a self-negating blog entry, commentator Adam Felber says, "Blogs suck. You should never,ever trust anything you read on a blog. Not even this."

He makes a number of points, including one that says bloggers, especially political bloggers, love talking about themselves, and that the blogosphere as a whole is pretty much useless because it's full of crap.

If you think this made a few folks nice and frothy, you should have seen...

* "Have something to say? I don't care": L.A. Times columnist Joel Stein said he didn't care what his readers thought, and that he didn't want to hear from them. It was pretty much a W.C. Fields-esque "Go away kid, ya bother me."

I saw the item via Metafilter, and in the discussion thread, they didn't have particularly nice things to say about Mr. Stein.

Of course, Mr. Stein is a humor columist, so perhaps one should have read it in the spirit in which it was offered. Not to say he's necessarily a good humorist; not being too familiar with his work, I was still asking "Is this guy for real?" before puffing myself up with righteous anger. But at least I did some checking before I opened my mouth.

So yes, I do feel superior to all those folks who fell for it. Nyah.

Anyway, to be clear:
* This is a blog.
* I am a blogger. (Among other things.)

Thanks -- Joe

Playing With New Features in AOL Pictures and woohoo

Hi folks -- hope you had a good weekend.

Here's a trifling little post with a picture of the clouds this morning:

Taken from the roof of the parking deck at AOL HQ.

I uploaded the photo to my AOL Pictures public gallery -- looking at AOL Pictures, I notice they've rolled out a few enhancements, including comment counts for individual pictures (in the gallery view).

In addition, Will from the Pictures team says that they've also launched an updated version of the woohoo slideshow thingy, with a few new styles of photo layouts; here's a quick and dirty woohoo; I chose to feature photos in my public gallery tagged "aol" (there are only 4 right now -- I have to go and tag my older photos), and I'm using the "Ken Burns" style:


I think the slow pan across the strangulation photo is particularly effective.

I will have to keep playing around; some of the new styles look more suitable if you have lots of photos in a given set; this one here probably works best for relatively small numbers of photos.

Now that Hamid is back from vacation, look for some updates and explanations on all of these things and more in the AOL Pictures blog.

Thanks -- Joe

Friday, January 5, 2007

Blog Fight! Blog Fight!

Journals Editor Joe getting choked by Journals Product Manager Stephanie

First, I want to make it clear that Journals Product Manager Stephanie is strangling me for purely illustrative purposes only.

Wired News had a feature on Tuesday entitled "Best Blogfights of 2006" that looks at some of the rollicking punch-ups that occured last year among some of the "A-List bloggers" out there.

If you follow the Internet and social media industry, you'll see that:
  • There are a lot of strong personalities involved -- you don't really see very many shy, wilting entrepeneurs
  • The names of a lot of these folks are pretty much interchangeable with the companies that they create, run, spin-off, sell, etc. Consequently, there's a lot of mixing of people's personal business with their business business
  • The overall community of these online movers and shakers is relatively small, fairly mobile and extremely incestuous
Combined with the immediate, uncensored and public nature of blogging, it can make for some interesting conflicts. Remember, "blogging is conversation," and gossip and screaming matches are conversation (although potentially much louder and more annoying).

It can be tedious, yet at the same time, it can be fascinating.

Anyway, see the Wired article for some of the more notable A-List blogfights of last year. You'll note that former Weblogs, Inc and Netscape honcho Jason Calacanis made the list for his clash with Digg co-creator Kevin Rose.

I would actually characterize that one as more of a product competition than a blog fight. (Not to say that Jason hasn't had his share of blog feuds -- I'd get into the details, except I'm no gossip [*cough*] and most regular folks don't give a hoot, anyway.)

Update: The Blog Herald has a nice take on this issue. For the A-listers, big loud blogfights can also serve to draw attention to what a company is doing -- and they say any publicity is good publicity.

The mixing of business and pleasure is only one reason why blogfights can get so nasty. The 37signals blog did an entry rounding up some thoughts on the topic: "Why do blog comments seem to bring out the worst in people so often?"

A lot of it has to do with anonymity and depersonalization -- people get bolder when they're dealing with someone from behind a screen (the phrase "Internet Tough Guy" comes to mind).

Of course, online flamewars are nothing new, and it may be that the ease of publishing and open nature of blog conversations just make it easier for other people to look in on flame-fests that were previously squirreled away in message boards, mailing lists, and chats.

Human nature is the overriding principle -- there's no greater impulse than a feeling of righteous indignation, and a lot of times, pride, the desire to get in the last word, or the need to "win" leads people to do things they wouldn't ordinarily.

And let us not forget the usual trolls and drama kings/queens -- people who thrive on stirring up trouble -- or the immature-behaving folks who just want to shout anonymous profanity in front of a wide audience.

Then again, you can't rule out mental illness -- blogger Jason Kottke posits that the unrepentant disruptor on the other end of the screen might actually be a sociopath or psychopath (link via Metafilter).

I try to avoid controversy in my own blogging, except when it's thrust upon me or I use less-than-stellar judgment. Maybe that makes me wishy-washy, I don't know.

Over at Netscape, Managing Editor and Lead Anchor C.K. Sample used his personal blog this week (there's that intersection of personal and business again) to respond to some of the more common flames and anti-social behaviors seen at social news and links sharing sites.

Is he shouting against the storm? Probably, but we all have to try. Remember, in the immortal words of the great philosopher and peacemaker, Jerry Springer:

"Take care of yourselves. And each other."

Have a great weekend, everyone.

Thanks -- Joe